View Single Post

Old 06-01-2007, 10:02 PM
  
jag767
Member

jag767's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: levittown ny
Send a message via AIM to jag767 Send a message via MSN to jag767
Quote:
Originally Posted by shabby View Post
I just picked up a fujita intake, first thing i noticed is how small it looked. So i measured the inner diameter of the stock intake and of the fujita. I couldnt believe what i saw, take a look...




The fujita intake has an inner diameter of around 2.5 inches, while the stock intake has an inner diameter of around 2.875 inches.
When you do the math, the stock intake area is 20.4 inches while the fujita's is 15.2 inches. The fujita intake is 25% smaller then the stock intake.
How on earth can the maf accuratly measure the air now? The area that it sits in passes 25% less air then the stock intake.
I cant believe that a company that specializes in intakes f@#$ed up like this, its insane. If the gxp wouldnt have a wideband o2 sensor the car probably wouldnt be driveable since the airflow is miscalculated.

the diameters of the tube and the raise at which air passes the sensor are totally independent of each other. the one intangible you did not mention is although the pipes is smaller the restriction towards the nose of the car is severely decreased by comparision to the stock air box, ergo reguardless of the diameter air flow increases dramatically. look at it like this.

if you have a funnel with a 12 inch cone, and a 1 inch expelling aperture, it will not releasing its contents as fast as a funnel with an 8 inch cone and 3 inch expelling aperture.

its a rough comparision but the dynamics are similar
jag767 is online now
Reply With Quote