SolsticeForum.com is the premier Pontiac Solstice forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 07-21-2008, 08:54 AM
   Ozz [Turbo 2.0 and not 2.4 - why GM?]
ozz
Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chester ILL
Anybody out there know why GM turbo charged the 2 liter and not the2.4 liter.Just curious. It just seems kind of strange to me. OZZ
ozz is offline
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 07-21-2008, 09:07 AM
  
Founding Member

LatinVenom's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
The 2.0 is a more advance design than the 2.4.
__________________
Aggressive GXP at $25,995.00 shipping of $600, Manual Transmission.
Options:
Air, $960; Chrome Wheels, $545; PCQ, Premium Package (Leather), $525; Radio, 6-Disc with MP3, $495; Monsoon, $395; Premium Acoustic Headliner, $150; and Sport Metallic Pedals, $115; all totals $29,180.00.
No XM/OnStar and NO Spoiler.

MODS (RKSport/Magnaflow dual exit exhaust system, K&N filter, Ventureshield.
First 1000. Aggressive with everything, NO XM/OnStar. SOLD
~~~~~~~
NASSOA
Founding member
~~~~~~~
LatinVenom is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 09:23 AM
  
Member

mena661's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rosamond, CA - Home of Willow Springs Raceway
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinVenom View Post
The 2.0 is a more advance design than the 2.4.
Also, the 2.0 (LNF) in the Solstice is not the same engine (although there are some similar parts) as the other 2.0's in GM's lineup. Exceptions are the new Cobalt SS and HHR SS which both have the LNF motor.
__________________
2007 Cool GXP with Darkside Top, 5 spd, Ebony Cloth, Monsoon with Single CD, Sport Pedals, XM, A/C
Mods - Solo Street/Race Exhaust, K&N Drop-in Air Filter, EDAL
mena661 is online now
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 09:29 AM
  
Member

Frank I's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Georgia Mountains
OZZ:

There have been several articles written on the reasons why GM changed from the 2.4 L to the 2.0L LNF engine. One very good and easy to understand article is "Amazing Ecotec2.0 Turbo(LNF)engine." You can find this article on the INTERNET just Google the above title.

A short answer to your question is the 2.0L engine went through a major strengthening program. Every major casting was recast to improve reliability, the engine bore was reduced to increase cylinder wall thickness, the crank is forged steel, water jackets are deeper for added cooling capacity and improved cylinder-bore roundness. Besides the crank improvement, the bottom end also features forged rods and cast pistons which have a dish face that deflects the fuel toward the spark plugs. The LNF engine was also fitted with variable valve timing and direct injection.

I could go on and on, but read the article mentioned above it will give you a lot of detail in addition to the basics I provided above. Hope this heads you in the right direction.

Frank I
__________________
07 Black GXP

Current Mods:
Leather, Suede and Embroidered Interior by JPM
SOLO Performance Mach Exhaust
SOLO High-Flow CAT
Hahn Intercooler
Westers Tune
Fijita Intake
Dashhawk
Beltronic G-Meter
Painted Calipers
Custom Painted Engine Cover, Intercooler Pipes and Fuse Box

Future:
DEI Cry 02 System for air & fuel cooling
Slotted & Drilled Rotors
Wide Body Kit if I can ever find one that I like
Frank I is online now
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 09:32 AM
  
Member

elwood58's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The OC
GM took the basic 2.4 design and reduced bore and shortened stroke to strengthen the motor for Turbo. Addition of direct injection is the next biggest change along with adding the Turbo.
__________________
2008 SLY GXP Auto with all of the goodies
3" Magnaflow CATBack Exhaust
K&N Drop In
Little Chromies, Kappashield, Evolution Cover
MRZ Billet Caps Under The Hood (Pure Bling!)
Short Antenna
ProClip iPhone System
Silverstar Headlamps
elwood58 is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 09:44 AM
  
Senior Member

Deepbluegxp's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Displaced Buffalo Bills fan, Southern MD
Here is a link to what Frank I referenced. The Amazing Ecotec 2.0L Turbo (LNF) engine! - Saturn Sky Forum
__________________
Team Solstice 2008
Click My modifications
See my car on cardomain.com
NASSOA Founding Member #48
Deepbluegxp is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 09:46 AM
  
Member

encriptor's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middletown, NJ
Better fuel economy could be another reason. There could be many reasons but just remember you don't need to have major displacement. Look around and you will some small displacement motors that make large power and some larger displacement making the same power. Take the classic EVO/STi war:

EVO: 2.0L = 291hp/300tq
Sti: 2.5L = 305hp/290tq

Plus last I heard the 2.0L ECOTEC has seen power of upto 1,400 HP. From day one when we all saw the ECOTEC here in 2002 being used in the Cavalier Dragster it was a 2.0L Turbo motor when the only version on the market was the 2.2L.

Personally I felt like GM always intended on making the ECOTEC 2.0L boosted powerhouse. And the 2.4L was more of the N/A solution. Because we have never seen a 2.0L N/A setup even from offering in the Cobalt it was Supercharged. And now we have a line of 1.8L ECOTECS and the even smaller displacement motors that are comming over as well.

The replacement for displacement is boost, and as we know with CAFEE standards being what they are, and the price of fuel being what they are you are more bound to see smaller displacement motors replaceing our usual 2+L motors. The only reason I don't see them going away is because if they are smart they will boost a larger displacement 4 cyl or a smaller displacement 6 cyl to start replacing the current 6 and 8 cyl options.

But then again this is only my opinion and I have no documentation to back it up.
__________________
The Festas!
1964 Chevrolet Corvette
2004 Pontiac Grand Am SE
2006 BMW K 1200 R
2007 Pontiac Solstice GXP
encriptor is online now
Reply With Quote

Old 07-21-2008, 11:27 AM
   Ozz
ozz
Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chester ILL
thanks all you guys&Gals out there for your response to my question I am sure glad that I found this forum surfing the Internet its already been a big help to me. Thinking about a CIA and new cat back exhaust for my car is it worth the money?I talked to a guy Sunday at a local car show who had I think a 2006 or it could have been a 2005 don't remember. But it was the only Solstice 2.4 there so it attracted me like a magnet had the hood open and I noticed that he had a CIA installed.After talking to him he told me that the CIA and duel exhaust were factory installed from GM.He told me that GM notified 25 of the first people who ordered a new car and asked them if they would be interested in some free factory up grades so GM put the CIA on and Dual exhaust on for him at the factory.So I thought I would share this interesting little tidbit with the rest of the readers OZZ
ozz is offline
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0