» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Pontiac Solstice Forum > General Solstice Discussion > Solstice GXP Discussion
Register Home Forum Gallery Owner Registry Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

SolsticeForum.com is the largest Pontiac Solstice Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2009, 10:43 AM   #61 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazan GXP View Post
Do any of you that are running the GMPP tune also have a CAI installed?
My understanding is that the stock air intake is very effeicient and that there isn't appreciable power to be had with a stock or GMPP tuned engine - people do that mostly for looks and to increase the noise (although that always surprises me - that people would want more sucking sounds....)
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 11-03-2009, 12:59 PM   #62 (permalink)
Member
 
Brazan GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belfair,WA
Thanks wspohn. I really wondered if the stock intake restricted it to where it needed more air. I really am not interested in more noise,just the best performance within reason. I am thinking very seriously going with the GMPP tune. It sounds like a pretty good deal for 30 HP and 80 ft/lbs of torque.
__________________
2008 Brazen GXP
Brazan GXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:08 PM   #63 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazan GXP View Post
Thanks wspohn. I really wondered if the stock intake restricted it to where it needed more air. I really am not interested in more noise,just the best performance within reason. I am thinking very seriously going with the GMPP tune. It sounds like a pretty good deal for 30 HP and 80 ft/lbs of torque.
Best deal out there if you car about factory warranty. The torque is very evident.

If you want more power after that, look to low restriction CAT and exhaust system.
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:32 PM   #64 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
What is a good exhaust for power

Wspohn,
I read that you were designing your own exhaust system.
I am still trying to figure out what is the best set up. And according to this article. Your new custom system will not be helpful, Just louder.
Read this link I'm putting here and let me know what you think.
Auto Exhaust Science

Its from Super chevy.
Kappster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:50 PM   #65 (permalink)
Member
 
RedHead RedLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charleston SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappster View Post
Wspohn,
I read that you were designing your own exhaust system.
I am still trying to figure out what is the best set up. And according to this article. Your new custom system will not be helpful, Just louder.
Read this link I'm putting here and let me know what you think.
Auto Exhaust Science

Its from Super chevy.
Almost none of that applies to turbos. -J
__________________
Drill Here Drill Now
RedHead RedLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:04 PM   #66 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappster View Post
Wspohn,
I read that you were designing your own exhaust system.
I am still trying to figure out what is the best set up. And according to this article. Your new custom system will not be helpful, Just louder.
Not exactly.

I am doing a system that reduces back pressure and component weight, and have based it on the street race system from Solo, which is simply a 3" pipe splitting into a couple of 2.5" pipes with no mufflers. I am inserting resonators in the final 2.5" legs to reduce noise while maintaining (according to Solo) 97% of flow.



As for power results, first, realize that the article you referenced was talking about (as I understood it) peak power readings being a little better in a V8 system with a little back pressure. The Solstice has a hash of a system compared to NA cars - the gas has to make its way through the turbo unit, which presents significant resistance, then the CAT, which presents more, before getting to the stock muffler, which presents yet more resistance. We are talking about removing the last of those impediments to flow, only.

Companies such as Solo have done dyno tests of their systems compared with stock thats show significant improvements over stock (that fact that these readings will go away if you still have basic GM tuning is irrelevant for our purposes). They claim 27 BHP benefit from the Street Race system. If that is true (and if you don't think it is, take them to task, not me), then the fact that I am adding a small additional resistance in the form of a muffler might reduce that by a BHP or two, but I can certainly live with that for the sake of noise reduction.

I was originally thinking of using a combination of Magnaflow resonators and some tip resonators I have used in the past on other cars, but in talking with Jeff at Solo, he offered me a solution that is not sold or listed on their site, and it looks like it will do the trick quite nicely. I should have it on there in the next week or two and I'll report back with results.
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:07 PM   #67 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHead RedLine View Post
Almost none of that applies to turbos. -J
Rats - you covered the same thing I did in one sentence!!
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:54 PM   #68 (permalink)
Member
 
Brazan GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belfair,WA
So how about if you removed some of the restriction in the exhaust system and then put on a less restrictive CAI? Then it seems to make sense to go with a CAI unless you just can't cram anymore past the turbo. Does this sound reasonable? Might as well if you are going with the gmpp tune to get all you can.
__________________
2008 Brazen GXP
Brazan GXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:55 PM   #69 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Resi or muffler



OK. so this is the system you are Building?
Kappster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:01 PM   #70 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brazan GXP View Post
So how about if you removed some of the restriction in the exhaust system and then put on a less restrictive CAI? Then it seems to make sense to go with a CAI unless you just can't cram anymore past the turbo. Does this sound reasonable? Might as well if you are going with the gmpp tune to get all you can.
No - the CAI does little and the stock intake is NOT a restriction. If you want a CAI, by all means fit one, but don't think you are making any improvements in power, do it because you prefer the look or the noise.

The GXP power improvements are to be made downstream with the CAT and exhaust. Even if you fit a straight pipe exhaust, there is little point in getting a CAI.
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:12 PM   #71 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappster View Post
OK. so this is the system you are Building?
Essentially the same, yes. Small differences between the Solo and RPI, including the fact that RPI never made a system for the Solstice (although some were made up using replacement tips) and GTS LE system bits - an expensive way to go given that it cost just under $1K.

Ironically, Werks blew the remaining stock out at the end of last year, before I owned a Sol, or I'd have probably been a buyer even at that price. The Gods must look out for poor coupe owners, though, because I got the Solo combo for about the same price as the Werks blow out price had been, and I like their workmanship.
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:21 PM   #72 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exhaust

My understanding is that the solo is a RPI knock off.
Anyway about it, The point of that artical was that a glasspack acts like an extension of the header collector. But the resinator (an empty can) is a good thing.
I would think that the best bang for the buck would be to do away with the cat all together. and a free flow muffler.
Kappster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:29 PM   #73 (permalink)
Member
 
wspohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: W. Vancouver BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappster View Post
My understanding is that the solo is a RPI knock off.
Anyway about it, The point of that artical was that a glasspack acts like an extension of the header collector. But the resinator (an empty can) is a good thing.
I would think that the best bang for the buck would be to do away with the cat all together. and a free flow muffler.
I don't think that is fair. There are only so many ways to get the gas out, and given that GXP owners, for the most part wish to retain the wtin outlets of the stock model for looks (even though it does nothing for power), the routing of the Solo street race was pretty much a given. To say it copied someone else would be like saying that anyone that builds a car with 4 wheels is copying the first one that did that. Remember also that Solo doesn't market that sort of system with mufflers in it - I had to drag them kicking and screaming into supplying me with what I wanted, which just happens to resemble the RPI solution.

I share your conclusion about the best thing being to eliminate the CAT, but where I live that is against the law.
__________________
Current fleet:
1958 MGA Twincam (race car)
1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster,
1957 Jamaican bodied MGA
1965 Jensen CV8,
1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
Bill in BC
wspohn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:47 PM   #74 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
You've got me there. Not Fair..
Its illegal in Arizona too. But Is it not a fact that most of the high flow cats don't do the job of a OEM anyway?.That it would fail the test? too? I think through magnaflow you can buy A High Flow Cat.. but its over 400 bucks. And its supposed to pass.
All I know is I'm Just having fun here and trying to learn.. not make anyone mad. Exhaust is a science and we pay lots of money for things we dont understand.... Like oil.
Kappster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:53 PM   #75 (permalink)
Member
 
LiquidPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA & Port Coquitlam, BC
Send a message via AIM to LiquidPT Send a message via MSN to LiquidPT
Quote:
Originally Posted by wspohn View Post
I share your conclusion about the best thing being to eliminate the CAT, but where I live that is against the law.
Oh, it's illegal in the USA, too. All of it. Doesn't stop people from doing it. Pretty sure you'd still pass AirCare...
__________________
LiquidPT aka Matt
driving Black Sun
2009 Mysterious GXP Coupe #100
LiquidPT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0