» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Pontiac Solstice Forum > General Solstice Discussion > Solstice GXP Discussion
Register Home Forum Gallery Owner Registry Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

SolsticeForum.com is the largest Pontiac Solstice Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2008, 07:56 PM   #31 (permalink)
Member
 
Daywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose GXP View Post
My prediction is less that 300 BHP..more like 290 and the Slobalt SS and especially HHR SS will be less than that as well. The potential for higher HP on those two is less considering they can't get the power to the ground even with the special launch control and no lift shift. Those aren't enhancements, they are requirements to make those cars even somewhat launchable.
Better watch out for the Colbalt SS TC, the mags just tested it in the quarter and it turned 14.0 at 103 mph. I have yet to see a stock Kappa pull that trap speed. I guess launch control and no lift shift are working pretty well and the 103 says the hp is there. It is pulling .9 Gs on the skidpad as well.

Dont get me wrong, still not a balanced track car because the front drive configuration but now no slouch on the street, you may be surpised.
__________________
Midnight BlueRedline
Delivered 2/17/07
Daywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 04-06-2008, 08:04 PM   #32 (permalink)
Member
 
Moose GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Macomb Twp, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalker View Post
Better watch out for the Colbalt SS TC, the mags just tested it in the quarter and it turned 14.0 at 103 mph. I have yet to see a stock Kappa pull that trap speed. I guess launch control and no lift shift are working pretty well and the 103 says the hp is there. It is pulling .9 Gs on the skidpad as well.

Dont get me wrong, still not a balanced track car because the front drive configuration but now no slouch on the street, you may be surpised.
That could be faster than any stock Kappa you have seen, but anything above mid 13.5 is slow in the 1/4 mile...yes...even my car. From what I see the LNF can be pretty quick in the 0-60 or 60' times, but we'll suffer in the top end as compared to any LSX powered car. Is that true?
__________________
__________________
I am a GM Engineer.

I do not claim to be a GM representative, all of my postings are my own interpretation and personal opinions.


2007 Deep GXP - M5, Loaded w/o OnStar
Mods: JPM Custom Shifter - Stubby Ant - WindRestrictor - Dejon TB Elbow - Dejon BOV Spring - JPM Center Console - JPM Visor Covers - Wester's Tune - Draw-Tite Hitch

NASSOA Founding Member
Moose GXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 08:15 PM   #33 (permalink)
Member
 
Go-N Def's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Manama, Bahrain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalker View Post
Better watch out for the Colbalt SS TC, the mags just tested it in the quarter and it turned 14.0 at 103 mph. I have yet to see a stock Kappa pull that trap speed. I guess launch control and no lift shift are working pretty well and the 103 says the hp is there. It is pulling .9 Gs on the skidpad as well.

Dont get me wrong, still not a balanced track car because the front drive configuration but now no slouch on the street, you may be surpised.
I watched Rusty hit high 13's. Completely stock...
__________________


Pics on MySpace


Go-N Def is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 08:42 AM   #34 (permalink)
Member
 
mena661's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rosamond, CA - Home of Willow Springs Raceway
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go-N Def View Post
I watched Rusty hit high 13's. Completely stock...
But we'll end up getting smoked by the end of the 1/4 with that 103 trap. It seems that car is putting a bit more to the ground than the Solstice but the FWD hinders its launch.
__________________
2007 Cool GXP with Darkside Top, 5 spd, Ebony Cloth, Monsoon with Single CD, Sport Pedals, XM, A/C
Mods: K&N Drop-in Filter, Solo Performance Street/Race Exhaust, Dunlop Direzza Sport Z1 Star Spec Tires, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs
mena661 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:02 AM   #35 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
watching the show with the stage kit it became brutally obvious some drivers were having engine reliability issues, it looked like they were going into limp moded and another driver couldn't start his car

these issues didn't happen before the stage kit and I don't think this is coincidence, I kind of doubt gm has the map figured correctly yet
perris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:08 AM   #36 (permalink)
Member
 
MeanSol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
The numbers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose GXP View Post
You're kidding yourself if you think it will be priced reasonably. I would expect the $1k range for a stage 2 (really a stage 1...right?) from GMPP>
Here is the break down
NA baseprice 22,785 @ 177 BHP = $ 128.73 per pony
GXP baseprice 28,465 @ 260 BHP = $ 109.48 per pony (what a deal!)

Difference of 5,680 @ 83 BHP = $ 68.43 per pony to step up to the GXP

Proposed Stage 2 from GMPP costing 1000 bucks....
a gain of 52 BHP is costing you $ 19.23 per pony (that is a steal compared to what you just dropped in order to get the GXP)
Even a supposed gain of only 30 BHP ( @ 290 ) still runs you about half of what you paid for your GXP power weighing in at a scantily clad $ 33.33 each.

Do I want to pay 1K for a stage 2 kit? No
Will I pay 1K for a stage 2 kit? No
Is there cheaper power to be had? Yes
What is the magic bang for buck number? that is for the market to sort out...

All in all, when you look at the numbers I would say, comparatively it IS reasonable since at the ppp or p3 (price per pony) for the GXP upgrade your Stage 2 would run about 3558.36
__________________
Team Solstice


MEAN GXP with the works, minus smoker, pedals, XM, Big Brother, and Onions
Current AAT topless outing record -10 degrees F at an average speed of 70mph for a total of 61 miles!
MeanSol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:15 AM   #37 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeanSol View Post
Here is the break down
NA baseprice 22,785 @ 177 BHP = $ 128.73 per pony
GXP baseprice 28,465 @ 260 BHP = $ 109.48 per pony (what a deal!)

Difference of 5,680 @ 83 BHP = $ 68.43 per pony to step up to the GXP

Proposed Stage 2 from GMPP costing 1000 bucks....
a gain of 52 BHP is costing you $ 19.23 per pony (that is a steal compared to what you just dropped in order to get the GXP)
Even a supposed gain of only 30 BHP ( @ 290 ) still runs you about half of what you paid for your GXP power weighing in at a scantily clad $ 33.33 each.

Do I want to pay 1K for a stage 2 kit? No
Will I pay 1K for a stage 2 kit? No
Is there cheaper power to be had? Yes
What is the magic bang for buck number? that is for the market to sort out...

All in all, when you look at the numbers I would say, comparatively it IS reasonable since at the ppp or p3 (price per pony) for the GXP upgrade your Stage 2 would run about 3558.36
with the gxp upgrade you also got a handling and breaking package, I believe the pony's cost far less then your analysis but it's hard to put a number on that

isn't anti skid and traction control worth a couple grand all by itself?

anyway, I'd pay the 1000 dollars as it is only a few hundred more then the after market offerings but will include warrantee it is a no brainer and actually costs far less then those that you'd buy and loose your warrantee

if it's produced without ranter protection then there's no reason to go with it

Last edited by perris : 04-07-2008 at 04:42 PM.
perris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 09:26 AM   #38 (permalink)
Member
 
Moose GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Macomb Twp, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by perris View Post
watching the show with the stage kit it became brutally obvious some drivers were having engine reliability issues, it looked like they were going into limp moded and another driver couldn't start his car

these issues didn't happen before the stage kit and I don't think this is coincidence, I kind of doubt gm has the map figured correctly yet
Just remember that show was filmed some time in the past....was it earlier this year or late last year? Somebody around here should know. Anyway, my point is that we shouldn't take any stage kit related issues as shown in the show as the current status.
__________________
__________________
I am a GM Engineer.

I do not claim to be a GM representative, all of my postings are my own interpretation and personal opinions.


2007 Deep GXP - M5, Loaded w/o OnStar
Mods: JPM Custom Shifter - Stubby Ant - WindRestrictor - Dejon TB Elbow - Dejon BOV Spring - JPM Center Console - JPM Visor Covers - Wester's Tune - Draw-Tite Hitch

NASSOA Founding Member
Moose GXP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 11:21 AM   #39 (permalink)
Founding Member
 
bradyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: farmington Utah
Based on my own experience GMPP kits are excellent.

Check this out:
gmpartsdirect <link removed as NSV>
Belt, Modular Pulley System, Fuel Injectors, $735 Retail, $625 wholesale, $575 street price. The injectors alone were $400-500 by themselves.

The kit added an additional 45 HP at the crank, with more boost, fuel, and the retune. GM has sold tons of these kits, I assume GM will follow the same formula for the GXPs.

I put that kit on my Cobalt SS and loved it. My dealer signed off on the work (in the GM vehicle history system) and installed the tune. I paid $75 for them to reflash the computer. The kit did not change the factory warranty in any way, especially since the dealer logged the installation.

I'm guessing we'll see $800 retail/$750 via GM Parts Direct.
__________________
2008 Black/Black GXP, purchased 7/23 right off the train.
Mod#1 blacked-out headlights
Mod#2 GMPP Intake -I like to hear my turbo.
Mod#3 Special Sauce (23PSI)
Mod#4 Solo Street Race
Mod#5 Repaint w/ Custom Silver Stripes
'07 Charger R/T Mama's car

Last edited by achieftain : 06-04-2008 at 08:41 AM. Reason: NSV link removed
bradyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 11:53 AM   #40 (permalink)
Founding Member
 
rlhammon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West side of Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose GXP View Post
Just remember that show was filmed some time in the past....was it earlier this year or late last year? Somebody around here should know. Anyway, my point is that we shouldn't take any stage kit related issues as shown in the show as the current status.
Show was filmed in October of last year. The availability of the kit was announced to the public at SEMA which is in the same time frame. SEMA announcements stated 4 - 6 months for availability... so, hopefully it will be soon when GM says something else on this kit.
__________________
My Mod Information Page

http://michigankappaclub.ning.com - The Michigan Kappa Club (MKC) Website

Michigan Kappa Club - Welcome Thread
rlhammon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 05:07 PM   #41 (permalink)
Member
 
shabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by mena661 View Post
But we'll end up getting smoked by the end of the 1/4 with that 103 trap. It seems that car is putting a bit more to the ground than the Solstice but the FWD hinders its launch.
Doubt it, since the cobalt probably has more traction issues then we do, this loss of traction would increase its trap speed at the end. I hit a 1.9sec 60 footer at the track, i'd like to see a fwd do the same on stock tires.

Quote:
Originally Posted by perris View Post
watching the show with the stage kit it became brutally obvious some drivers were having engine reliability issues, it looked like they were going into limp moded and another driver couldn't start his car

these issues didn't happen before the stage kit and I don't think this is coincidence, I kind of doubt gm has the map figured correctly yet
Are you use they were running the gmpp kit or the same tune gm ran at topeka with 425lbs/ft of torque?
__________________
1993 talon tsi awd - stock on the outside, modded on the inside
2007 solstice gxp - Solo Performance 3" mach exhaust + hiflow cat - dyno sheet
shabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 05:17 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
AdamVIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Hollywood
Quote:
Originally Posted by perris View Post
watching the show with the stage kit it became brutally obvious some drivers were having engine reliability issues, it looked like they were going into limp moded and another driver couldn't start his car

these issues didn't happen before the stage kit and I don't think this is coincidence, I kind of doubt gm has the map figured correctly yet

Thats a good observation that I didnt make myself. I would like to add though that these guys seem to be complaining about the cars as crunch time approaches. These are not the best drivers and they know if they screw up theyre out. Its a lot easier to blame the car for your slowness. Aside from the guys that spin out they seem to stay together pretty well and these problems only seem to show up after they spin.
__________________
Victoria
2007 GXP Manual.
AdamVIP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 05:42 PM   #43 (permalink)
Member
 
Daywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
The stock tune can have problems stalling and restarting after a spin. This is not specific to the Kappa. Other cars have this issue as well. It can be as easy as fuel getting away from the pickup point to not getting on the clutch quick enough and allowing tires/drivetrain/engine rotate in reverse momentarily amoung other things.
__________________
Midnight BlueRedline
Delivered 2/17/07
Daywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 05:47 PM   #44 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamVIP View Post
Thats a good observation that I didnt make myself. I would like to add though that these guys seem to be complaining about the cars as crunch time approaches. Its a lot easier to blame the car for your slowness. These are not the best drivers and they know if they screw up theyre out.
ya, I took that into consideration but they were definately going into limp mode, you saw it on a few drivers that couldn't get power and had to use their skilz to stay competitive, I believe one in the lead went to limp mode, no turbo and still stayed comepetitive

this was indeed an ecu problem as far as I can see
perris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 05:58 PM   #45 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by perris View Post
ya, I took that into consideration but they were definately going into limp mode, you saw it on a few drivers that couldn't get power and had to use their skilz to stay competitive, I believe one in the lead went to limp mode, no turbo and still stayed comepetitive

this was indeed an ecu problem as far as I can see
These drivers and pit crews knew something- if they were willing to go so far as to use brake pads with missing material, I wouldn't put it past them if they were using the Stage II, and doing the wastegate rod mod, and blowing the stock hose clamps right off. That'll result in no boost. I think one of them also cracked their intercooler. Racing puts significantly more stress on the car than daily driving, even if you get on it. Hitting the rumblestrips at speed, other cars etc.

Heck, stock we're running into issues with the hose clamps not holding. Imagine more boost. Then if you're leaking boost and reading it in the MAF- you're gonna run extremely rich.
MGar is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0