SolsticeForum.com is the premier Pontiac Solstice forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 02-04-2007, 06:11 PM
   Why should I choose a supercharger or turbo?
Member

diamoney's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Tennessee
Now that we are getting the options, I would like to hear arguments for and against the two power upgrades.

I think others will also be interested in what our forum boosters think.

Thanks to all in advance.
__________________
"Louie, I think this is the begining of a beautiful friendship."
#000600 Aggressive
Founding member NASSOA (#86)
Best performance enhancement to date-
was: GoodYear Eagle F1s; NOW: DDMWorks MP62 stage 1 fun monster!
Top down and lovin' it! (Top up in the less fine weather)
diamoney is offline
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 02-04-2007, 06:14 PM
  
Member

compression's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Turbo- means you can make alot more power. You can choose to build the engine up and make even more power with out changing anything in your turbo set up

Cool Factor= Turbo
__________________
Performance Auto and Sound
Compression Performance
compression is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-05-2007, 03:58 PM
  
Founding Member

LatinVenom's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Let me say this since that topic can become as bad as politics.
If you have already done mods to your car like CAI, header, then the S/C will let you keep those mods.
Another small point is heat, installation maybe a bit easier for the S/C.
I would suggest to check out both systems and see how they stack against each other, ease of installation, low end power, high end power, etc.
__________________
Aggressive GXP at $25,995.00 shipping of $600, Manual Transmission.
Options:
Air, $960; Chrome Wheels, $545; PCQ, Premium Package (Leather), $525; Radio, 6-Disc with MP3, $495; Monsoon, $395; Premium Acoustic Headliner, $150; and Sport Metallic Pedals, $115; all totals $29,180.00.
No XM/OnStar and NO Spoiler.

MODS (RKSport/Magnaflow dual exit exhaust system, K&N filter, Ventureshield.
First 1000. Aggressive with everything, NO XM/OnStar. SOLD
~~~~~~~
NASSOA
Founding member
~~~~~~~
LatinVenom is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-05-2007, 05:02 PM
  
Member

solsticetime's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
I'd say the S/C is a "Safer" option.
It's easily upgraded, slap differant pulley on there and make more power.

The SC sounds PIMP. Is that what you wanna hear?

The whine of a S/C will turn heads.

Everyone buys a turbo for the FastnFuriousness of it.


What are you willing to spend now AND later?
Upkeep of a high hp turbo'd car can be costly.

Read THIS

I love this topic, because there are no right or wrong answers. Both are great applications. One is not better or worse than the other either. Remember that.
__________________
Proud supporter and fan of:
Red Bull Drift Team 2008

Team "Team Solstice" 2008
solsticetime is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-05-2007, 05:22 PM
  
Member

madmods's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale, Az
I agree with LV about it getting heated. Each has its own pro and cons.
__________________
Team Solstice 2009
How I built my solstice:
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2661209

2008 show sponsors: Team Solstice 2008, JPM, Wind Restrictor, Werks, Aspis, Norm's Fiberglass, DDM, AfterShock, Universal Studios, Cardomain, Easystreet AirLift, , Parkerracing, Madmods-Motorsports, Scap. To be a sponsor, just pm me.
See madmods in the upcoming Fast & Furious 4.

2009 Colorado Nationals attendee! I will be there and want to
party with everyone. Some of you owe me a beer.
madmods is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-05-2007, 05:45 PM
  
Senior Member

RevmanII's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mayfield, New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by madmods View Post
I agree with LV about it getting heated. Each has its own pro and cons.

Madmods, I noticed recently that your sig includes a Mallet supercharger. I don't remember reading anything about it as far as impressions etc. As always, inquiring minds want to know .
__________________
07 Solstice, black, 5spd manual, convenience, preferred, and premium packages, LSD, Monsoon, XM, A/C, ABS, chrome wheels.

Mods: DDM Stage II supercharger. Solo Performance hi-flow cat, and SQR-2 catback. Norms rear fascia. MSD DashHawk.
RevmanII is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-05-2007, 10:57 PM
  
Member

scdyne's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: so-cali - Between Willow and LACR
I have both a centrifugal S/C and Turbo charged Saturn (first gen). The Turbo is a track only car with about 10K turbo miles max and the S/C is my daily driver with something north of 80K miles on an engine that just went over 100K total miles. I drive at least 120 miles a day to and from work and wouldn't have it any other way. Both cars make about the same max HP and TQ, but the S/C is easier for the lady to drive. (Actually she wont even drive the Turbo because it's too scary) Disco Potato w/ internal wastegate @ 11psi.

You can make just as much power with a centrifugal S/C as you can with a Turbo and you can make the same linear increase in power with a Turbo as you can with an S/C.
Centrifugal S/C's are nothing more than belt driven Turbo's and weather it's crank driven or exhaust driven it takes HP to compress the air in the volute.
I my experience you usually have to upgrade the cooling system and almost always use an intercooler to run a turbo, but many S/C systems work just fine with the basic cooling system and non-intercooled. I find that a simple designed S/C system will cost less than a turbo system, but produce the same results. S/C Size has been an issue in the past, but Rotrex just smashed that problem with a blower the size of an alternator and impeller speeds equal to a turbo.

Really it’s Coke or Pepsi, Elephant or Donkey, Saturn or Honda.
__________________
-Adam Chant
SCdyne Performance Engineering
"Tune it or lose it!

TEAM SCSKYSC 2008
I don't know..?

Last edited by scdyne : 02-06-2007 at 09:08 AM.
scdyne is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-06-2007, 12:12 AM
  
Member

solsticetime's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2006
Agreed....
Potato, Potato.
__________________
Proud supporter and fan of:
Red Bull Drift Team 2008

Team "Team Solstice" 2008
solsticetime is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-12-2007, 04:42 PM
  
Member

wrecks314's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange Park, Fl
which setup will give you more low end power because i rarely shift past 4k?
__________________
9/11/06 - 07 'Cool' Solstice 2.4 ac/ABS/7spkMonsoon/18in chrome/ onstar/xm/ebony leather/5spd/slipdiff/headliner/$30k
wrecks314 is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-12-2007, 06:17 PM
  
Member

SolGTP's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clemson, SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecks314 View Post
which setup will give you more low end power because i rarely shift past 4k?

a positive displacement s/c....only way to go for lower rpms
__________________
06 Cool solstice - Positively Displaced intercooled SUPERCHARGER Current Status : having fun
98 GP GTP - ~500hp (intercooled, 15psi) Current Status :broken Tranny
86 C10 Silverado ~ 450hp (383"^3 NA) Current Status : broken tranny
SolGTP is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-12-2007, 07:41 PM
  
Moderator

achieftain's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: turning right to go left
I agree with SolGTP. My experience with teh S/C is instant gratification and power build through the entire band. In general turbos need to spool up, while a S/C is already turning.
__________________
When more than one friend wants to ride shotgun

No, I do not work for GM or any subsidiary or supplier.
achieftain is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-22-2007, 11:58 AM
  
Member

solkool's Avatar

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Livermore, Ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by achieftain View Post
I agree with SolGTP. My experience with teh S/C is instant gratification and power build through the entire band. In general turbos need to spool up, while a S/C is already turning.
What are the cost differences between the two? I know its apples to oranges but which is cheaper to buy/install and then maintain?
solkool is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-23-2007, 07:27 AM
  
Member

compression's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Quote:
Originally Posted by solkool View Post
What are the cost differences between the two? I know its apples to oranges but which is cheaper to buy/install and then maintain?

cheaper way to go in the end is super charger, best power band way to go is turbo charger. I am very happy with my turbo set up right now. This car just wants to go now. I am trying to keep it out of boost but it is just soo hard
__________________
Performance Auto and Sound
Compression Performance
compression is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-23-2007, 09:06 AM
  
Member

carlintexas's Avatar

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Muenster, Texas
IMO - I agree with scdyne & solgtp. Seems to me the s/c would be a cleaner, easier more durable option. Option is the key word - we didn't have any (only one) in May '06.

Eliminating heat would have saved me $600 for the Werks radiator and $525 for Norm's fenders. Either that or I need to move north to get out of this summer heat!

There was a thread started last fall regarding an s/c kit that would be coming out in March or April to give us an affordable s/c option to compete with Mallett. Wonder how many $7k s/c kits Mallett has sold? There was even a rumor about GM offering a s/c kit sometime this year.
__________________
TEAM SOLSTICE 2008
NASSOA(tm)
Founding Member #2
1st 1K #781
DDM Custom Turbo System
DDM Pro-Beam, A-Pillar Pod, PLX gauges
Starlight red I/C pipes and coil cover

GReddy Profec B Boost Controller, HKS BOV
3" Magnaflow cat-free
Werks radiator / Precision billet grilles
Norms vented fenders / GXP Spoiler
Riken Raptor's 255/45/18
carlintexas is offline
Reply With Quote

Old 02-23-2007, 09:54 AM
  
Member

Molson's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pincher Creek, Alberta, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by compression View Post
Cool Factor= Turbo

what!? How could a turbo be cooler than this??