Pontiac Solstice Forum banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Wanted to bring Ping back up and see if we could get some valued opinions in one place. I know there are varying comments on ping embedded in a number of posts but it's hard finding them all.

My opinion. The ECU program on the 2.0 over time at sustained and constant hwy cruise speeds appears to bias itself strongly towards maximizing gas mileage. In doing this it appears (I'm guessing) to lean the air fuel ratio out quite a bit based on the constant speed and load pattern for hwy cruising.

It appears if you suddenly load the engine after cruising for some time, the car will ping/rattle/knock (take your pick). It's actually quite loud and pretty unnerving.

I can make this condition happen pretty consistently but it's only after cruising at constant speed for some time. If I vary the torque loading on the engine some, it will not ping again at all, no matter what load I'm putting on it.

In other posts I've read on here, there appeared to be a significant number that described ping when suddenly accelerating from hwy cruise speeds.

It appears the ECU program skews the air fuel mixture hard to gas mileage mode on the hwy and doesn't react well enough (fast enough) to change the mixture to a more optimum setting for performance mode.

Any thoughts on this?

Jazz
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,857 Posts
Thoughts? Yes - detonation kills turbo engine pistons. Even though you have spent the money on the GMPP tune, IT is probably the problem and should either be tweaked by a tuner or replaced with Westers or others tune. Hope you still have all the old bits.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Thoughts? Yes - detonation kills turbo engine pistons. Even though you have spent the money on the GMPP tune, IT is probably the problem and should either be tweaked by a tuner or replaced with Westers or others tune. Hope you still have all the old bits.
We have the first opinion in this request for thoughts on Ping. And that is that the GMPP Tune causes ping.

Any other thoughts out there on 2.0L Ping?

Jazz
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,600 Posts
If you have audible detonation in your Kappa your car should be going into limp home mode. If you think you have detonation you'll have to use a scanner to verify as you cannot hear it in this car. Monitor intake temperatures and has quality and report back.

Norm
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
511 Posts
Oh yes you can Hear the LNf when it detonates/ping it sounds like two skeltons fighting in a metal trash can full of beer cans LOL.

I never had ping issue until i played with the waste gate rod. at one point in the "playing with that " to much and had to back off , in the end it seemed i backed off about stock? But i have only 91 unless i pay for 105 we have at most pumps here but its to expensive and if i was running 105 i want it tunned for 105( man that would be sweet. But when that rod is tight and it spools up to fast for the rpm i would get some crazy knock at md range and NO knock at wot? NEVER seen a code, i have a scanner for codes too.

Have you played with your waste gate?, you may go blind lol
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
Oh yes you can Hear the LNf when it detonates/ping it sounds like two skeltons fighting in a metal trash can full of beer cans LOL.

I never had ping issue until i played with the waste gate rod. at one point in the "playing with that " to much and had to back off , in the end it seemed i backed off about stock? But i have only 91 unless i pay for 105 we have at most pumps here but its to expensive and if i was running 105 i want it tunned for 105( man that would be sweet. But when that rod is tight and it spools up to fast for the rpm i would get some crazy knock at md range and NO knock at wot? NEVER seen a code, i have a scanner for codes too.

Have you played with your waste gate?, you may go blind lol
We have a 2nd opinion on ping. That being it's is (or may be) caused by having adjusted the waste gate rod.

To this I will add I have added 2 turns on my waste gate rod.

However I've heard my car ping 3 times. Twice before I made the adjustment on my waste gate rod and once after I made the adjustment.

More opinions or thoughts on ping?

Jazz
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,639 Posts
We have two Sky Redlines. My wife's is completely stock, and mine is stock with the exception of the GMPP tune. We are at 5000 feet above sea level and the best gas that is generally available is 91 octane:

I have heard both cars have engine knock after long cruise times (long trips of 3-4 hours) at sustained speeds and then "spirited driving" there after. I have also heard both cars have engine knock after filling up with a tank of "questionable" fuel. In all instances, in both cars, the ECM took action to correct the condition following the knock.

For Example: The last time I drove my GMPP tuned Sky for a trip back to NE was over Thanksgiving. Air temp during the trip there was only about 30 degrees or so. I was driving constantly for about 4 1/2 hours at a constant cruise speed of 70 MPH. Elevation remained about the same at 5000 above sea level (upper panhandle of NE). The following day a warm front came through and air temp jumped up to 65 degrees. I was making a short trip in the area and I went to pass someone on the highway. I was in 4th gear, doing about 60 MPH and went WOT. The boost maxed out at 26 PSI and I had a knock incident about half way through the pass. Of course I immediately backed off the gas a little and knock went away as demand fell off. I ran a couple WOT tests within the following hour and the ECM had made appropriate adjustments, no more knock, and peak commanded boost was backed off to 24ish in the same driving parameters.

I have seen the same thing happen with my wife's completely stock car. So this "problem" is definitely not peculiar to the GMPP tune. I agree with Bob that any of the aftermarket tune guys will tend to run A/F richer to prevent this and that "knock" is REALLY bad, especially since we have cast pistons. But I have got to believe that the GM engineers factored engine knock incidents into their calculations when coming up with the 100,000 mile power train warranty. :lol::lol::lol:

Also, I can count on one hand the number of times I have noticed a knock for both cars combined, in two years. And as we have gone forward in time, the incidents have fallen off. During the first year on wife's car I noticed a couple times, but have not heard one since. On my car I heard one when stock (first 4 months), then maybe 2 times within the first 6 months after the GMPP tune install. And then not again until the one on this last Thanksgiving trip. So this tends to suggest that the ECM command tables do indeed adjust to your driving style and environmental conditions. But if you encounter a drastic air pressure change, especially after a long sustained cruise speed, that you can still have a knock.

In summary, I agree with the OP that this seems to be a byproduct of the ECM going for max efficiency during extended cruise speeds. And I am sure this has got to do with GM trying to hit C.A.F.E. standards as well as E.P.A. standards. Unless I start noticing a regular problem, I am not going to get very worried. The key is to be aware of it, and get your foot out of the gas immediately if you have a knock incident. Even if you have the A/F set more rich, you can still have a bad tank of gas cause a knock incident anyway.:willy:

If you are noticing a lot of knock issues at various RPMs and throttle command, then there may be something else going on. We have at least one incident of a bad cam chain tensioner causing this issue as discovered by ddmworks. And I know that Flash was still fighting a knock issue on his car, but in that case he was seeing it at less than WOT and lower RPMS as well.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
919 Posts
NEVER seen a code, i have a scanner for codes too.

Have you played with your waste gate?, you may go blind lol

There are no codes for Knock, only if the sensors or the control curcuit is bad. Setup the Dashhawk to record degress of timing retard to see if it's pulling timing.

I believe the knock sensors are flat response sensors vice tuned, so the ECM looks for a certain freq and amplitude before it decides it's a true knock signature sound then pulls timing. The ECM will always try to keep knock retard at 0.

After hours of driving in a very small operating window I could the LTFT's being skewed and going to WOTin 5th causing a lean spark knock condition.

As for a non GM tune, say bye bye to your warranty.

If you always fill up from the same gas station, try filling up at a different Tier I station to see if it's just the blend that the engine does not like.

I doubt if an aftermarket tune is safer, might be richer, but most likely has more timing also.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,857 Posts
Except people like Vince and Lyndon can tweak tunes to a single engine based on scans of the ECM while running.

BTW, the OP shows a BOV with the GMPP tune. If this is correct, having BOTH a wastegate AND a BOV could be a problem.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
919 Posts
Except people like Vince and Lyndon can tweak tunes to a single engine based on scans of the ECM while running.

BTW, the OP shows a BOV with the GMPP tune. If this is correct, having BOTH a wastegate AND a BOV could be a problem.

Wonder if the BOV is reacting quicker than the stock bypass valve. Along with the wastegate setting changed it could be causing a lean condition quicker than the ECM can react.

Can the DI system do a asynchronous injection pulse? That is how a sequential fuel injection system deals with a rapid positive change in the TPS signal.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion Starter #11 (Edited)
BTW, the OP shows a BOV with the GMPP tune. If this is correct, having BOTH a wastegate AND a BOV could be a problem.

I1ULUZ "Wonder if the BOV is reacting quicker than the stock bypass valve. Along with the wastegate setting changed it could be causing a lean condition quicker than the ECM can react."

About the above two comments, remember, I had knock after hitting a WOT after a long cruise before I did any mods and GS Stage 1 also is reporting knock in his wifes stock SOL after an instantaneous WOT after a long cruise. That's the key here. What's causing this condition?

It doesn't appear to have anything to do with mods and right now I'm sympathetic to GS Stage 1's comment of "this seems to be a byproduct of the ECM going for max efficiency during extended cruise speeds" and I1LUZ's of "After hours of driving in a very small operating window could the LTFT's being skewed and going to WOT in 5th causing a lean spark knock condition".

Thanks for your thoughts guys.

Jazz
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
142 Posts
i have a 07 w/gmpp on 91 octane that has a little timing taken out. and it still knocks occasionally. could spark plugs and gapping have something to do with it? i went from the 07 plugs to the 08+ plugs all gaped to stock and no changes. is their another brand, type or gap that could help?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
381 Posts
Oh this is fun. If this thread is intended to define a cause for "detonation" then I think you first need a few definitions and some clarifications to guide the ensuing hypothesis.

First. Lets define two kinds of detonation or knock.
- Knock - will, can, or should be defined as spontaneous combustion of a fuel air mixture caused by a rapid rise in cylinder pressure from a spark ignition event resulting in the auto-ignition of said fuel air mixture ahead of the flame front from said spark event. This is the most typical kind of knock, typically a result of too much spark.
- Pre-ignition - should be defined as the ignition of the cylinder charge prior to the spark event, caused by a variety of not so well understood factors.

Second, we should clarify some operating condition myths.
- The ECU does not adjust desired lambda leaner than 1.0 during a highway driving cycle, except for closed loop toggling. We would saturate the catalyst with oxygen and violate the Nox limit for an emissions test if we did.
- Most "lean spikes" in the exhaust under heavy load are caused by scavenging (high overlap allowing boost pressure to push fresh air in to the exhaust stream), this fresh air pushes the pre-cat O2 sensor lean, however in cylinder air charge actually ends up rich because the ecu fuels for the measured amount of air, even though it is not all trapped in the cylinder.
- The GM performance tune will probably not be any worse for pre-ignition than the standard production calibration because pre-ignition has very little to do with spark advance. Pre-ignition is not detectable by knock sensors because the ignition event occurs ahead of the spark event, and does not produce the same frequency oscillation as typical knock event. In short, there is not a whole lot the ECU can do to stop pre-ignition except cutting off the fuel.


Ok, anyway, on to the meat.

It is well known that knock events in combustion engines are closely tied to fuel quality and pressure rise within the cylinder. That being said, high effective or geometric compression ratios (IE, BOOST) will increase an engines sensitivity to knock, as well as aggressive spark advance. Furthermore the farther you retard spark advance, the more heat you introduce in to the combustion chamber and surrounding components. This means that as you retard spark, you may delay the burn such that it reduces the likely hood of knock, however you will begin to heat up the system causing the sensitivity of knock to increase. One could say that sustaining these high load / retarded spark conditions will just produce a never ending spiral of knock / spark retard / more knock / more spark retard. The ecu is designed in such a way that at a certain point of spark efficiency loss it stops adding boost and you just begin to lose torque. This allows the engine to protect itself against damage from these kinds of events.

- Weather plays a huge role in the capability of the engine controller to deliver a desired torque. The more torque you demand from the LNF, the more sensitive it will be. For instance, dry air knocks a lot more than humid air, hot air knocks more than cold air, cold air is dry, etc etc etc etc.

- All boosted engines will knock! The fact is that you are continuing to cram more air in to a cylinder than it's naturally aspirated limit, it's going to knock. The question of course is how much and for how long. The ECU's knock control system, if operating properly, manages the spark such that it does not continually knock during a driving cycle.
-- There are a few adapts for this system, one even for fuel. Basically if the ECU is convinced that you have put crap in your gas tank it permanently reduces spark to adjust for that driving cycle. The next driving cycle it tries again.
--- The more likely cause for knock after a long highway trip are two fold:
- - - - First: Everything is warm. The combustion chamber and piston, etc, have all gotten hot from driving for such a long time at moderate load.
- - - - Second: The ECU has probably not been operating in a "high" knock intensity area, so more than likely you will not have any spark knock correction.

--- Addressing knock on tip in after a hard accel. This goes to the boost and retarded spark comment. You will knock on tip in after a hard acceleration, you just got everything hot with boost and retarded spark! If you see the knock retard light up after this kind of an event, say you ran up a hill at WOT, and now are driving straight and level and it's knocking, don't be concerned. The knock system is doing it's job! if you don't see the knock system doing anything, then be worried.

While audible knock is concerning, a quick couple of events isn't going to kill anything. it's the sustained knock thats a problem. Of course, if you are concerned about it, try a higher grade gasoline, if available. If you are concerned about the mechanics, pull the plugs and look for corrosion of the side wire, it'll look like cavitation, also borescope the engine and look for nibbling around the edges of the piston, a little is no big deal, if it looks like a bread carving knife you have a problem.

A quick couple of notes about pre-ignition. There are a few things that can cause this, one of which is spark retard. Basically you get the plug so hot it turns in to a torch and ignites the fuel as it is sprayed in to the cylinder. You'll know when this happened because everything will seem fine and then the engine will be laying on the floor disassembled in front of you. :devil:
- The other kind is caused by a mixing of constituents in the combustion chamber, oil, fuel, air, crap, etc. That causes ignition during the compression stroke and results in a huge knock event. Tuners have typically run rich air fuel mixtures to get around this, however with both the stock and GMPP tunes it shouldn't be required.

Personally I have only had one or two "ping" events in my solstice in the 33k miles that i have on it, however I watch the knock sensors pretty frequently and they are indeed working.

Ok in summary. Knock is generally cause by too much spark, lean AFR, or bad gas.

Pre-ignition is generally caused by an overheated spark plug or constituent mixing that allows for combustion before the spark event.

In the hopes of providing actual data for a discussion I would like to entertain some more specific information about the types of events you are seeing Jazz.
- I understand highway, so I'm guessing warm engine, say 95-100C coolant, what kinds of days, hot? cold? muggy? all of the above? Do you have a data trace? I can compare with some data from my car.

I hope that I have provided some insight and not just blabbed :willy:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,857 Posts
All correct. But audible knock in an LNF engine means that the computer can't respond enough. I know from logging my RL that there is often some KR, but NEVER audible knock. And, I have logged plenty of highway miles both stock and tuned. Since the OP has a coupe, it certainly does not have the old (wrong) plugs. I still believe that the WG should be put back to its neutral position, BOV removed, and see what happens. At least THAT question would be eliminated.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
44 Posts
Discussion Starter #15 (Edited)
Wow. Now that's a lot of great information.

Thanks davytudope, sodamninsane and snaponbob.

Somehow I think if I could digest all sodamninsane said it could be stated in some shorter 'here's the core synopsis'. There's so much good info here and I need to figure out how to assimilate it.

And snaponbob. I'm not sure I agree with your comments on back to stock on waste gate and aftermarket BOV removed. I tend to believe the Hahn BOV should be adjustable over a range wider than the stock BOV. So with the Hahn, it could be set for exactly the same value as stock, only it's adjustable with plus and minus range limits beyond.

With my car being able to be pushed as hard as you would want without ping or knock, I don't think a little waste gate adjustment is the culprit. If so, it would do it on a much more repeatable basis. As my knock has only happened 3 times in almost 10,000 miles, I don't believe a fixed setting like the waste gate adjustment would be the culprit.

Ok. Lets hear some more good thoughts on why this knock/ping occurs sometime with sudden acceleration after sustained highway cruising when it never seems to happen when pushing the car in very spirited driving.

Thanks,

Jazz
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
919 Posts
And snaponbob. I'm not sure I agree with your comments on back to stock on waste gate and aftermarket BOV removed. I tend to believe the Hahn BOV should be adjustable over a range wider than the stock BOV. So with the Hahn, it could be set for exactly the same value as stock, only it's adjustable with plus and minus range limits beyond.

As my knock has only happened 3 times in almost 10,000 miles,


Ok. Lets hear some more good thoughts on why this knock/ping occurs sometime with sudden acceleration after sustained highway cruising when it never seems to happen when pushing the car in very spirited driving.

Thanks,

Jazz
What parameter are you changing on the Hahn BOV? What is the stock bypass valve not doing to need the BOV. What are the gains of using a BOV vice the stock bypass valve?

3 times in 10,000 miles? Really that much, it's shocking that it's not an oily mess on the highway. Didn't realize an engine could take so much abuse!!

What gear where you the 3 times you heard these pings?

5th or 4th

AC or Defrost on?

Passenger and luggage? close estimate of total weight in the car at the time.

Hot day?

Filled up at the same gas station before each event?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,857 Posts
Wow. Now that's a lot of great information.

And snaponbob. I'm not sure I agree with your comments on back to stock on waste gate and aftermarket BOV removed. I tend to believe the Hahn BOV should be adjustable over a range wider than the stock BOV. So with the Hahn, it could be set for exactly the same value as stock, only it's adjustable with plus and minus range limits beyond.

Jazz
Only suggesting this as a diagnostic step to eliminate the BOV causing the problem on your car. That's all.

Something to keep in mind - you have HEARD it three times, but how much is going unheard (for whatever reasons)? A BOV and a wastegate basically serve the same function. I have had more than one vendor tell me that there is no need for both, and one (reputable) vendor said one should not have both on the same car.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
919 Posts
A BOV and a wastegate basically serve the same function.
Bob

I have to disagree with you, a BOV/Bypass valve are the same thing, BOV vents the boost to atmosphere and makes a "FAST and FURIOUS" sound where a Bypass valve vents it back into the intake track. Both keep the reflected pressure wave from hitting the compressor wheel so it does not slow down between shifts or is damaged during fast throttle closings. In no way should it be used to control boost levels.

Wastegate vents exhaust gas pressure/flow around the turbine wheel to control boost. Should stay closed till the desired boost is reached then open and close enough to maintain that boost pressure and prevent boost creep.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
669 Posts
Thoughts? Yes - detonation kills turbo engine pistons. Even though you have spent the money on the GMPP tune, IT is probably the problem and should either be tweaked by a tuner or replaced with Westers or others tune. Hope you still have all the old bits.
Seeing as I am (well, was) using the GMPP tune and my motor problems began during a period of time where I was driving 300+ mi/day both heavy highway and city I wonder if this little "feature" of the ECM is what caused the chain of events that led to my motor going POP!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,857 Posts
Bob

I have to disagree with you, a BOV/Bypass valve are the same thing, BOV vents the boost to atmosphere and makes a "FAST and FURIOUS" sound where a Bypass valve vents it back into the intake track. Both keep the reflected pressure wave from hitting the compressor wheel so it does not slow down between shifts or is damaged during fast throttle closings. In no way should it be used to control boost levels.

Wastegate vents exhaust gas pressure/flow around the turbine wheel to control boost. Should stay closed till the desired boost is reached then open and close enough to maintain that boost pressure and prevent boost creep.
I over simplified. The wastegate will relieve the pressure surge at sudden drop throttle, as a BOV will, just in a slightly different way.
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top